By AMANDA VAN MULLIGEN
When I first moved overseas I was struck that some expats are more equal than others. We all live in countries and cultures other than where we were brought up, or have legal residence. The difference lies in the “temporarily or permanently residing” part of the definition.
I found a job in an international corporation that employed both Dutch staff and people on expat contracts who’d moved overseas with this company. I’d arrived independently (borrowed trailer and all) to be with a Dutch partner and was on a local contract.
After four years, the others moved on to further country assignments or repatriated back ‘home’. I was still here, an expat on a local contract.
Through my career in human resources, I’ve delved into a world full of expat issues (trailing spouses, third culture kids, portable careers, international schooling, cost of living allowances, spousal work permits, relocation services, the 35% ruling, rotation schemes.) None applicable to me.
My kind of expat gauntlets include a backwards step in our career; job hunting in a foreign language and unfamiliar market; endless paperwork without external help to legitimise our stay; the shock of in-laws who speak an unknown tongue; kids who naturally speak two languages; friends we struggle to express ourselves with; mundane tasks requiring interaction with locals; loss of independence; a lack of common culture with our offspring; missing knowledge about the world we live in.
What separates one type of expat from another is the temporariness of the challenges.
No contract end, no get-out clause. For those of us who signed up for life with a local: are we lifelong expats or not expats at all?
+++++
Amanda van Mulligen is a British-born writer, blogger and mother experiencing life in the Netherlands. This week marks ten years of her expatriatehood.
+++++
Related posts:





Pingback: Defining moments: October newsletter « expat+HAREM, the global niche